On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:24 AM, <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ah, I missed that line... This way of recording the expense is > misleading, for two reasons: > > 1) It does not present the actual cost for Haiku of the expense item > described (the booth space in this case). > > 2) ReactOS did not make a donation (which basically implies a gift for > a cause) but rather simply paid their share of the cost. > > I think it would be more acurrate to simply remove the ReactOS donation > line item and record the what the actual cost of the booth was to Haiku, > that is, $530.95 ($1,030.95 minus $500). I was not entirely happy with the way that came out either, but it is more accurate from an accounting stand-point. I also don't think I recorded the $500 from ReactOS as a donation, but it can be considered income or as a reimbursement and belongs in that section of the report. Also in the future I will send a notification here when new financial reports are posted. I should have the 2009 one done within a week or so. -- Regards, Ryan