On Sep 30, 2014 10:55 PM, "Urias McCullough" <umccullough@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Karl vom Dorff <karlvd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I honestly do not see what you are talking about. Please point it out, pg. > > number and paragraph. > > > > I mention specifically by-laws because that is what it says on NY State's > > website. > > They *are* the bylaws. "Articles of Incorporation" are commonly the > starting bylaws by which corporations abide by. They just don't > contain all the details you want them to. > > > "The existence of the corporation begins upon the filing of the Certificate > > of Incorporation with the Department of State. After the corporate existence > > has begun, an organization meeting of the initial directors designated in > > the Certificate of Incorporation must be held for the purpose of adopting > > by-laws, electing directors and the transaction of any other business. (See > > Section 405 of the Not-for-Profit Corporation Law.)". source > > > > And if I have missed it, where is the fixed date for elections? > > > > "In addition, a meeting of members must be held annually for the election of > > directors and the transaction of other business on a date fixed by or under > > the by-laws. (See Section 603 of the Not-for-Profit Corporation Law." > > This part appears to be missing from our bylaws... and this, coupled > with our lack of annual meeting/election seems to be your proverbial > "Smoking Gun" that you are holding over Haiku, Inc. at the moment > because you fundamentally disagree with how things are being run. > > Sorry, but all I really see coming out of this discussion at this > point is that you very much dislike how Haiku, Inc. is run. Of course I dislike how it is being run because it is not being run correctly. But it is not about me or you. Sorry if you take that personally. > > We obviously haven't fixed every mistake that was made when Haiku, > Inc. was initially formed (some of these are entirely new to me) - as > such we're likely still out of compliance with NY state not-for-profit > regulations. We need to fix this problem in order to remain a tax > exempt entity operating within the state compliance requirements. I > suppose as a director, *I'm* at risk for being sued by the state of > New York being privy to this now. I get the choice to resign, or help > fix the problem - I'm curious - what would you choose? > > I suspect that even if we resolve the technicalities and get the > housekeeping in order, you still won't be satisfied until it's run the > way you propose it should be. I have offered to help collaborate over new by-laws (where a lot of the problems and technical difficulties have been resolved) but this has been consistently ignored. > > What I don't expect to see from this discussion are the things Haiku, > Inc. *has* improved over the years... Usually things that are working are not discussed. I am not holding a smoking gun over Haiku Inc. I am just pointing things out that I think are putting Haiku Inc. at risk. > > - Urias >