Hi, On 2014-11-09 at 14:55:07 [+0100], Richie Nyhus <richienyhus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > In my opinion, > > it would be a mistake to let such software, over which we have no > > control, constitute a part of our base infrastructure. > > It is basicly just the enterprise version of the likes of Gmail, Hangouts, > Calendar, Google+, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Forms, Slides, Youtube, Analytics > and free limited use of AdWords. > > It is more complimentary than a replacement for anything. I believe luroh was refering to the list of development related tools (i.e. code review tools and issue trackers), which contained quite a number of free-for-non-profits software, too. And I would like to second his notion - always take those offers with a grain of salt (as everyone knows: there's no such thing as a free lunch). For me, the danger in those tools can be that they might not be available in source, so we have no way of adjusting them. While I'm not convinced that having access to a tool's source code will always enable us to adjust the tool as we'd need to, my experience tells me that getting ar free-as-free-beer software vendor to listen to our wishes is much less likely. cheers, Oliver