Hi, On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Rimas Kudelis <rq@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Richie, > > Richie Nyhus wrote: > >> I have just granted you the admin permissions on en-UK in Pootle. You can >>> start refining your locale. >>> >> Cheers for doing that. It seems a bit easier than the old system. >> >> Pity the UK catkeys from the old system were lost though. >> > > I don't think they could have been lost, IIRC, there was a proper string > migration. It's just that the old system was aware of string inheritance, > whereas Pootle is not, and that will be a problem for locales like yours, > which inherit most of the strings from a parent locale. Pootle will never > show your locale as complete, because it assumes that each string has to be > translated, or at least copied to the target locale. > I have looked into it and so far I have not seen any option for string inheritance, so in that sense we are out of luck. > Although... if we had a post-processing script which simply strips all > identical strings from a target file, you could simply copy all strings > that don't need translation, thus making Pootle happy. I'm not sure if our > post-processor script does that though... It does not, but the question is whether or not that would actually matter much, both in terms of speed and memory. Regards, N>