[haiku-doc] Re: Getting up to speed...

  • From: Bruno Antunes <sardaukar.siet@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Niels Reedijk" <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:22:01 +0100

Hello,

I suggest some kind of conference this week (IRC, MSN, whatnot) to get
all compasses pointing to the same place.

What do you guys think?

-- 
Cumprimentos,
 Bruno                            mailto:sardaukar.siet@xxxxxxxxx

Monday, April 23, 2007, 1:24:01 PM, you wrote:

> 2007/4/22, Sevik <sevik9@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I used Cygwin/Windows combination (I'll have a BeOS system up soon though)
>> with Subversion and Doxygen to do an anonymous checkout and generate the
>> documentation.

> Great. You don't actually need cygwin. http://www.doxygen.org/ has a
> binary that works on 'standard' windows.

>> Please let me know if I am on the right track in terms of understanding
>> though.
>>
>> 1. The Doxygen commands are not in the source but are in separate .dox
>> files. Our job is to build these .dox files by hand for each class.

> Yes.

>> 2. I can understand how we create the shell of the documentation -- listing
>> the names of the classes, methods and members, and showing class
>> relationships. But where are we getting the technical explanations ?

> Well, I think that we can get the bigger picture complete by the guys
> that wrote the classes. The problem is that for some classes, the
> original developers aren't around anymore. So basically it will
> require a good look at the source and deducing ideas based on that.

>> The purpose of some of the methods are not obvious to me from looking at the
>> source code. Is there an external source of information (BeBook?) ? Or is
>> one of the joys of doing the documentation, the opportunity to learn the
>> technical details of everything ? [Which is fine too since my goal is to
>> develop some desktop apps for Haiku.]

> I forgot to mention this before, but it is actually _forbidden_ from
> even looking at the BeBook for inspiration. We need to avoid using
> anything from the Bebook, and the best thing to do is not to look at
> it at all.

> Niels




Other related posts: