On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:23:15, Humdinger <humdingerb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hey Joseph, > > It's OK if it's clear what haiku revision is the basis of the docset, > since the API isn't stable yet and the documentation uncomplete. > Adrien also mentioned on IRC that if it's generated from the Haiku > source, it must follow the MIT license and show the authors somewhere. > > Thanks very much for your efforts, I guess the more ways to access the > docs, the better! > > Regards, > Humdinger Thanks Humdinger. Also, the Haiku API documentation: http://api.haiku-os.org is generated daily from source and I would need to update the documentation for any changes. Could I update the generated docset monthly with the specific Haiku revision?