-- Jorge G. Mare, on Sat, 01 May 2010 07:58:33 -0700: > On 05/01/2010 02:23 AM, Humdinger wrote: > > If you want the agreed upon rules changed, open a new thread for > > discussion and subsequent vote. > > That's bureaucratic BS. An acknowledgement of the obvious -- that the > two man rule is flawed for this type of cases -- and a one-time > exception to the rule would have been the smart thing to do; I don't see the special case here. Either the two-men rule makes sense or not. If you want to change it, discussion and vote is the accepted approach in a project. > I am pretty > sure nobody would have objected, and we would not be having this > conversation, Marcos would already be translating, and we would be on > the way to having one more translation. Don't worry. A few more lines and I'm not having this conversation anymore. > I did not see anything rude in Marcos email, just the natural > frustration of someone who is offering his time and skills where it > is > obviously needed and is being given the bureaucratic runaround. Hey. I just pointed him to the document describing the current process of adding a new translation. He didn't come back to ask for an exception to the two-men rule. He just immediately severed his ties to the project altogether! I hope you don't misuse this instance as another proof how the "elite" is allegedly pushing away the community in a few months. Regards, Humdinger -- --=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=-=--=- Deutsche Haiku News @ http://www.haiku-gazette.de