Zenja Solaja <solaja@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Anything in between (like Gcc 4.x, 64-bit port, new API) is not > guaranteed > to be binary compatible with official R2. I was under the impression > that > the current GCC 4.x version of R1 was from day #1 claimed to be only > an > interim solution, with no binary backwards compatibility guaranteed. That's the plan; maintaing three sets of compatibility libs is surely not what we are aiming for. Bye, Axel.