Hi all, Using a better mailing list: On 2010-01-20 at 08:26:42 [+0100], Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 2010-01-19 at 19:28:21 [+0100], Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx> > wrote: > > On 2010-01-19 at 19:01:56 [+0100], Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > On 2010-01-19 at 17:57:59 [+0100], superstippi@xxxxxx wrote: > > > > Modified: > > > > haiku/trunk/src/add-ons/kernel/file_systems/netfs/authentication_ser > > > > ver/ auth entication_server.rdef > > > > =================================================================== > > > > --- > > > > haiku/trunk/src/add-ons/kernel/file_systems/netfs/authentication_ser > > > > ver/ auth entication_server.rdef 2010-01-19 16:05:19 UTC (rev > > > > 35168) > > > > +++ > > > > haiku/trunk/src/add-ons/kernel/file_systems/netfs/authentication_ser > > > > ver/ auth entication_server.rdef 2010-01-19 16:57:59 UTC (rev > > > > 35169) @@ > > > > -15,7 +15,7 @@ > > > > internal = 0, > > > > > > > > short_info = "authentication_server", > > > > - long_info = "authentication_server ©2004-2009 Haiku, Inc" > > > > + long_info = "authentication_server ©2004-2010 Haiku, Inc" > > > > }; > > > > > > I'm wondering what our policy for the copyright info in the resources > > > is. I don't think any part of the code is actually copyright Haiku, > > > Inc. (unless you transferred yours), so that doesn't really fit. Do > > > we ignore that for sake of simplicity or do we want have the > > > resources reflect the actual copyrights? > > > > How about "Haiku Project" or "The Haiku Project"? Such a thing doesn't > > actually exist as an identity, unlike "Haiku, Inc.". > > Would be OK by me. Alternatively we could pick one of the authors (the > first, the one who has written the most code, or the current maintainer) > and make it "©2010 John Doe et al.". Not a bad idea, but feelings could be involved in picking the main maintainer. If other's are OK with using "The Haiku Project" as copyright information in applications, I'd prefer that. Best regards, -Stephan