Joseph Prostko wrote: > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Siarzhuk Zharski <zharik@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > Anybody else considers that sys/xattr.h should be hidden back from gcc > > default paths set? > > I don't think it would hurt to add the /boot/develop/headers/gnu > directory to the gcc defaults at all. As things stand now, the > xattr.h header is the only header in the gnu directory, so while it > could be referenced directly when building, it should ease some pain > by having it included by default. As I mentioned in a previous email, > I meant to add headers/gnu back and do a full rebuild of everything. > I got a bit delayed, but can jump on that today and have new packages > generated for late tonight or tomorrow. That said, if anybody > outright objects from having the headers/gnu directory added back to > gcc's INCLUDE_DEFAULTS, please let me know, and I will hold off on > making the changes. +1 from me. CU, Ingo