On 2016-12-04 16:18, Axel Dörfler wrote:
Am 02.12.2016 um 22:22 schrieb Julian Harnath:
On 02.12.2016 17:48, Axel Dörfler wrote:
Also, I would like to examine our options to make our packages more ABIThis is something I've been thinking about as well a while ago. If we
agnostic so that you can use the same package no matter if you're using
gcc2h or gcc5h. That would make us a lot more flexible with regards to
that stuff.
had some kind of ABI-agnostic intermediate layer, it would not only
solve the gcc2/5 problem, it would also allow binding to Haiku APIs from
languages other than C++ altogether. [...]
Actually, while that would be cool, I was reaching for a far more
closer goal: having a packaging scheme that allows the packages to be
identical for gcc2h, and gcc5h; ie. there wouldn't be a primary and
secondary architecture anymore, but only two equal different ones.
I may have worded that poorly, though :-)