On 2016-12-04 11:02, Adrien Destugues wrote:
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 10:03:36AM -0600, kallisti5 wrote:
On 2016-12-02 14:33, kallisti5 wrote:
>
> So... where does that leave us for R1? Those improvements are all R2+
> sounding.
Things have quieted down and I haven't heard any additional ideas...
So... Anyone have any final -1's for:
R1: x86 gcc5h
Does that apply to beta1 as well? I think it is not the right time to
switch architectures. I have spent some time setting up build bots for
the packages, and all of them are gcc2h. If we want the beta release to
happen quickly, I would strongly suggest using these existing bots
rather than starting over once again (for the 3rd time...).
