On 2008-09-06 at 15:00:30 [+0200], digitalteufel <digitalteufel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It seems that the only issue with a dtrace port is with the CDDL license but > I think that there are ways to address such concerns. Nope, another concern is that it's probably quite a bit of work. And just porting it is only half the job. One also needs to add lots of probes in the kernel code. Besides, while not dynamic as dtrace, our kernel tracing is pretty nice too. I particularly like the advantage that the traced information are available in the kernel debugger. CU, Ingo