Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > It slowly dawns on me, what you're trying to say. You want to > introduce > some means to mark certain static constructors so that they aren't > invoked > automatically. I find that unnecessarily complicated, though. I actually completely misunderstood your comments to bug #4782, and thought you wanted to have some automatic way to evaluate the complexity of a constructor. And this was the more conservative counter proposal that would give you more control, but still allowed for some automatism :-) > I would > rather call all constructors and adjust the code that has > constructors that > shouldn't be called that early. Either by moving code from the > constructor > to an explicit Init() method or by constructing the object explicitly > in a > static buffer like: > > static char sObjectBuffer[sizeof(Foo)]; > static Foo* sObject; > ... > sObject = new(sObjectBuffer) Foo; That's indeed the solution I would prefer as well. Bye, Axel.