On 02/03/2008, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Michael Lotz" <mmlr@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Count me as one of the proponents of the "alternative" format. We had > > this discussion a few times now and I think we always came to the > > conclusion that it is really a matter of taste and being used to. > [...] > > P.S.: While we are at discussing matters of taste, we could also > > again > > argue about the pros and cons of "char *variable;" and "char* > > variable;" ;-) > I love coding guidelines discussions :) > Since I was more or less the only proponent of our current style here > (IIRC), to get this over with, how about we compromise to the > following: > * use column style for classes > * don't indent public/private (saves a tab) > * use "char* variable" instead of "char *variable" in C++ code this is the only one I don't like, but I can get used to it. > * don't use ", fMyMember(...)" initializers (my greetings to Stippi ;- > )), but "fMyMember(...)," > > Does that make everybody happy somehow? :-) > And even more important: does that sound like something everyone is > able to follow? > > Bye, > > Axel. > > > Regards, -- Salvatore Benedetto (a.k.a. emitrax) Student of Computer Engineer University of Pisa www.messinalug.org