On 6/3/07, Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
3.4.4 seems a little old. Didn't cygwin usually use pretty much bleeding edge versions?
Unfortunately, no - that's where cygwin is stuck at the moment. I can optionally use the 3.4.3 package as well. I read somewhere that gcc 4.x is not compatible with mingw/cygwin - and apparently nobody has been in a hurry to fix this. I don't know the details. Is this going to be an issue? The code seems to have built without errors - I had assumed this was only a linking issue. Do you think maybe gcc 3.4.4 has generated bad objects that won't link? - Urias