"Truls Becken" <truls.becken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > BTW, does anybody else feel that the organization of /boot/beos and > /boot/home/config could have been more consitent? Fonts, for > instance, > are located inside etc in one and not in the other. Generally, some > stuff in etc should rather have been in system. One way to look at it > is that /boot/beos/system is the same as /boot/home/config, only with > bin and etc "dragged out" to be closer to the root of the file > system. > With multiuser, maybe they should be "dragged in" again since they > become more private to the system when equivalents in /boot/common > are > introduced? Maybe then it would be possible to make the three domains > have identical structure? We'll see, but you're right of course: they are not very consistent as of now, and it would be great to fix this. Bye, Axel.