I have read the thread from the begin and it was much helpful...thanks to everyone! There is nothing preventing users to not use this API and this >> compromises the whole approach, right? The user could just use tracker >> or the terminal to confuse the add-ons. >> > > I think what he is saying is that there would still be the FS, but the > server will provide the backend of that FS, hosting also the add-ons. That > approach seems doable to me. It allows to have more convenience user land > APIs which interface directly with the server, and hosting the add-ons may > be simpler to implement. Seeing Person files directly would still work via a > dedicated FS, but tightly controlled via the server. > That is what i meant. Actually i'm looking at the netfs code, it seems the only filesystem with a server backend. I'll do my proposal in the next days, thanks for the help! Regards