Niels Reedijk <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I guess this is the final message from me. There are 64 developers. > Seven participated in this thread. You make it sound like it were a problem. > I shared my views on why voting is a bad way to reach a decision. In > the end very few votes that took place and that will take place are > the best way to reach a decision. All the others reduce very complex > issues to a +1 or -1, without looking into who will be doing the > work. The idea is to have a discussion before the vote to make it possible to reduce a complex issue to a +1 or -1. > And I guess time will tell whether voting procedures will actually > increase votes or not. I don't really think so, and see no problem with that. The only reason against the current voting mechanism would be if it caused bad decisions, and I don't think we really had one of those yet (the only thing I can remember is the include order). Bye, Axel.