On 2009-12-15 at 22:17:40 [+0100], Urias McCullough <umccullough@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Niels Reedijk <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > It's good to have a discussion on voting. If you look at the past > > votes, I think that one conclusion we can draw is that there is very > > little interest in most votes that are held. I think there are about > > 64 people in the developer group (that is from a quick count on > > dev.haiku-os.org). I didn't do accurate counts, so feel free to correct > > me, but I think that most votes hardly get more than 10 voters per vote. > > I think in some cases, there will be a large number of people who don't > actually care about the outcome of the vote - for those individuals, they > simply don't vote at all - but perhaps we should instead request an > "Abstinence" vote from these people indicating that for a particular > topic they are indeed neutral. > > This way, we won't always be wondering where all the other voters have > gone - and we know they're still paying attention ;) Please no. If someone starts a discussion and then later a vote, it is being done to get input from others and to make a decision. If both these criteria are met, I can't see anything wrong with how we do things currently, and IMHO we are in pretty good shape, the project moves forward. I don't need to see hundreds of mails expressing the same opinion just so nobody wonders what each single one of us thinks. If someone makes a good argument in a mail, I am happy and I don't have to repeat it or even write a mail with a +1 (most of the times). Best regards, -Stephan