Jan Klötzke <jan.kloetzke@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Good news is that I have the in-kernel vm86 mode call working. :-) > But at the [...] Very nice! > * May it be an option to change the return value of vm_page_fault() > to know in > the arch code if the page fault could be handled or not? I'm not sure why there should be any page faults inside a vm86 call - wouldn't it be an appropriate requirement to only operate on locked in memory there? Or is there something we might not be able to control? In any case, the vm_page_fault() can always handle the problem - it will either panic or crash the app in question if there is a more sever problem. You could also use vm_soft_fault() instead of vm_page_fault() if you need more control over this. > * Why are all signals sent to the team (main thread) and not to the > causing > thread? Because then only that thread would be stopped - but you want to stop the whole app, and thus, the main thread is the target. Bye, Axel.