[haiku-development] Re: VOTE: Git or Mercurial (hg) as Haiku's new source control tool

  • From: Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:33:42 -0400

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ok, I finally found the time to implement a way of fetching somewhat useful
> revisions from git repos.
> They look like this (for a clean state, i.e. a revision from Haiku's repo):
>        haiku/master-39382-g1234567
> or like this (for a revision not available in Haiku's repo):
>        haiku/master-39387-g7654321 [haiku/master-39382-g1234567]
> or even like this (for a revision with changes in the working dir):
>        haiku/master-39387-g7654321-dirty [haiku/master-39382-g1234567]

So the second number is just a count of the commits, more or less?
That might even match up with the SVN revisions in a git svn clone of
our SVN repo.

Those look really good to me. Can we just decide on Git and be done with it?

Or maybe all the current fence-sitters can just cast their vote for
Git, and hopefully bring it into first place :)


Other related posts: