[haiku-development] Re: VOTE: Git or Mercurial (hg) as Haiku's new source control tool
- From: Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 00:06:45 +0200
On 2011-05-13 at 23:28:07 [+0200], Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@xxxxxx>
wrote:
> Am 10.05.2011 um 21:15 schrieb Niels Sascha Reedijk:
>
> > Anyway, I miss many names in this threads, so let's suggest we
> > run this vote until Saturday 00.00 GMT?
>
> Thanks. If given the choice of either Git or Mercurial,
>
> I vote for Git.
>
> For some time I've worked with Git and Mercurial in parallel and I
> personally found Git more convenient to handle.
> I wouldn't mind staying with SVN and using the official Git mirror
> though.
You mean with a then writable Git mirror? Or how else would you push
commits to subversion?
> When converting, I would prefer mapping SVN usernames to real names +
> emails please. This has not been done for the current mirrors.
Ah, right, thanks for reminding me, I will try to change that.
cheers,
Oliver
Other related posts:
