[haiku-development] Re: VOTE: Git or Mercurial (hg) as Haiku's new source control tool

  • From: kallisti5 <kallisti5@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:50:32 -0500

On Tue, 10 May 2011 22:11:35 +0200, Stephan Aßmus wrote:
Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> schrieb:

On Tue, 10 May 2011 21:15:48 +0200 Niels Sascha Reedijk
<niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't remember exactly how long our standard voting time would be
(7
days?). Anyway, I miss many names in this threads, so let's suggest
we
run this vote until Saturday 00.00 GMT?

I don't know about the others, but my vote is still pending, because I don't feel I can make an informed decision yet. E.g. the whole revision
numbers topic has been discussed at some length, but the proposed
solutions are not optimal and mostly theoretical. I assumed Oliver's
recent changes were done to be able to actually test some of those
theories, which I find an excellent idea.

CU, Ingo

Same here. I think the vote should be postponed until these results
get published.

+1 (although I already voted)

For those interested, there is a running total of the current votes in
the #haiku-dev topic.

Thanks!
  -- Alex

Other related posts: