Siarzhuk Zharski <zharik@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Um, I actually meant fixing the module list iteration code itself > > instead of the USB module; generally using > > get_next_loaded_module_name() is at least not the correct way > > either :-) > No problem. If you let me play in your "sandbox" - I do it. :-D Sure, feel welcome; I'm just anal about coding style and such things, but I'm sure you'll find your way ;-) Bye, Axel.