Siarzhuk Zharski <zharik@xxxxxx> wrote: > > * ToDo: this could be changed > > */ > > If you don't want to do it yourself, I could probably pretty > > pleased > > into doing this soon :-) > OK. Of course, I can to hack the Stack constructor myself and ask > Michael to approve my changes. :) Um, I actually meant fixing the module list iteration code itself instead of the USB module; generally using get_next_loaded_module_name() is at least not the correct way either :- ) Bye, Axel.