Hi Jonas, "Jonas Sundström" <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > that is adding a menu, > The features I added combined with the ones > I was planning can't all have buttons and > checkboxes, IMO. Menus are neat. Sure, I'm not against adding menus in general, either :-) > > and hide common and > > handy functionality (like a history) behind it. > > It doesn't feel like a small add-on anymore. > The history is equally one click away. That spot > just moved a little and got somewhat easier to hit. First, of all, I must apologize a bit, because what I wrote relied on having it tried once some time ago, and my memory kind of blurred it a bit. Anyway, I don't think that adding the history to the menu is a good idea, because it doesn't fit that well there (the immediate context is the text control, and users expect it to be there, too, at least I was puzzled - it only fills the contents of the text control, it's not some kind of preset that would make the menu a good place for it). My biggest gripe, though, and that's why I continue to use the version I think Oliver released before, is that it doesn't remember its history, and that's what made the bad impression on me regarding "it doesn't feel like an add-on anymore" - since it didn't remember the previous context, it felt like I would start a separate app instead. Addendum: it seems it sometimes remembers the history, and sometimes, it doesn't. All of a sudden, my previous searches were all there again when I just tried. > I admitt a few of the menu item names and shortcuts > could be improved. (Alt-F vs Alt-O, etc) > > I've found the "Trim to Selection" feature the most > useful of my changes. It limits the next search to > current hits, or selection thereof. Speeds up things > considerably. Command-N isn't bad either. I obviously haven't used them, but since it is usually always used with a directory originating from Tracker, I don't think that Command-N will get much use, or is even needed in any way. I'm not against menus, but I think those items in the menu indeed add little value to the application itself - all the items that make sense to me, and are useful in general, were also present before. I don't see the need for "Trim to Selection" either, as it doesn't make any sense to me to manually filter out results that I already see in front of me. Also, the double line below the menu bar looked odd. > I don't agree with the notion that a Tracker add-on > has to be small or simple. They're just a way to > launch an app/utility on/with a set of files. (Not > all that different from how applications and > documents often find each other.*) But then you could use "Open" or "Open With" instead. An add-on should be an extension of the original application, IMO. > If you prefer Tracker Grep to be a shallow front-end, > then we have different creative vision for it. > I don't mind stepping aside though, honestly. Well, just don't step aside because of me :-) But in any case, I don't see any added value in making TrackerGrep a standalone application - IMO that's not really how you would ever use it; it creates an alternative usage pattern that is not as useful or powerful as the original one. > *(IMO every BApplication should be possible to set > up with a shortcut in Tracker, replacing Tracker's > "Add-Ons" menu with user-configurable shortcuts in > the "Open with..." menu.) I like usage oriented better than program oriented, ie. I would like to have a shortcut to edit a file instead of just view it (or vice versa), but I don't see much value in being able to open TrackerGrep (or any other application besides DiskProbe) on all files. Bye, Axel.