[haiku-development] Re: The r1alpha4 branch
- From: Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:13:50 +0200
On 2012-08-20 at 12:31:05 [+0200], Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2012-08-20 at 10:33:08 [+0200], Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > Not having a leading 'hrev' will make the implementation much more
> > difficult, as it actually
> > involves the following:
> >
> > - adjust the git-hookscript post-receive.pl to support different tagnumber
> > namespaces
> > - adjust the apache redirections from Trac's source browser to Cgit
> > - adjust Trac's internal detection of revision tags in tickets
> >
> > the latter two would get more complicated and less reliable if we'd no
> > longer have a unique
> > (well, nearly) tag prefix ('(h|bt)rev').
>
> Is the prefix the issue or how it is mapped. E.g. I'd find a generalized tag
> name like hrev[<branch>-]<revision> (where <branch> defaults to "master")
> fine, too.
Yes, being able to rely on the 'hrev'-prefix is more reliable than having to
look for things like 'rX[yyy]', especially within Trac tickets.
cheers,
Oliver
Other related posts:
