On 2012-04-20 at 20:13:08 [+0200], Donn Cave <donn@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Another way to approach this might be to make sure Terminal handles > the mode switch sequence(s) (and it looks like it now does not, so > that would take some work.) > > To the extent that termcap is relevant at all, then you may specify > whichever flavor of cursor you prefer, and include the respective > mode switch in the termcap screen mode initialization. An application > that knows how to override that will get what it expects, and the > rest will get what termcap leads them to expect. > > Unfortunately, that won't help so much with remote applications, > since they're working from a different termcap. (E.g., the BBS > example that may have brought this up.) To be honest this does puzzle me. I mean the termcap definitions should be the same everywhere -- exactly because of remote logins, since otherwise it doesn't even make sense to use a common terminal type like "xterm" instead of just one specific for the particular terminal app (and version) for the local OS. But then again, the whole termcap/terminfo is legacy and I wonder why no one has managed to introduce a method that works the other way around (i.e. let the client application ask the terminal for its configuration). CU, Ingo