Hi, > "Ryan Leavengood" <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Now regarding the removing of the virtual keyword on several > > overridden methods, I suppose this is fine since I doubt any of those > > classes will ever be subclassed themselves. I'm not sure it has any > > benefits though (I am no C++ expert though.) > > Please don't do this. Carrying the virtual keyword into the subclasses > just makes it clear that it's in fact a virtual overridden method - > besides from the eventual warning in GCC 4 it does no good. > > Bye, > Axel. > i agree on that, even if it does not harm either. so i will add them back where needed. :) Regards, Julun -- GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail