"Michael Lotz" <mmlr@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:23:52 +0100 CET, Axel Dörfler wrote > > I tend to the latter, since you'll usually have only one editor in > > place for them, anyway, at that's enough as far as we need the MIME > > database (I see little use of more differentiation beyond that). > > Also, the latter is already in use on BeOS. > Yes, I'd also go for a single text/x-source-code to put all of them > under. It > gets a bit crowded for no real benefit in my eyes. If someone really > wanted to > have a type for each it is still possible to configure it that way. The registrar currently has hard-coded text detection. It seems they are used before the file extension kicks in. Bye, Axel.