[haiku-development] Re: Should Haiku, Inc. sign the FSF SecureBoot petition?
- From: François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 18:26:21 +0100
On 29/12/2012 17:37, Paul Davey wrote:
> SecureBoot itself is not really the problem, its the inability to add
> trusted keys to the system or boot anything else by any means that is.
> If its possible to use the M$ bootloader to chainload another system then
> that can work though is dependent on M$ keeping such a feature, and if its
> possible to add new trusted keys then its possible to add one for a signed
> haiku bootloader,
That's all theory and dependent on M$'s benevolence, which we all know
is great.
> also nothing says the key has to come from M$.
That's the problem, in theory we could make our own keys, but they will
never be included in hardware by vendors unless they come from M$ since
they don't care about us anyway.
François.
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] Should Haiku, Inc. sign the FSF SecureBoot petition?- Alexander von Gluck
- » [haiku-development] Re: Should Haiku, Inc. sign the FSF SecureBoot petition?- François Revol
- » [haiku-development] Re: Should Haiku, Inc. sign the FSF SecureBoot petition?- Alex-P. Natsios
- » [haiku-development] Re: Should Haiku, Inc. sign the FSF SecureBoot petition?- Jimmy
- » [haiku-development] Re: Should Haiku, Inc. sign the FSF SecureBoot petition?- Gabriele Biffi
- » [haiku-development] Re: Should Haiku, Inc. sign the FSF SecureBoot petition?- François Revol
- » [haiku-development] Re: Should Haiku, Inc. sign the FSF SecureBoot petition?- Paul Davey
- » [haiku-development] Re: Should Haiku, Inc. sign the FSF SecureBoot petition? - François Revol
- » [haiku-development] Re: Should Haiku, Inc. sign the FSF SecureBoot petition?- Gabriele Biffi
- » [haiku-development] Re: Should Haiku, Inc. sign the FSF SecureBoot petition?- Juha-Jarmo Heinonen