Hi, > I'll start implementing journal read support into the ext2 code, however > it will then be some kind of ext2/3 hybrid. Should I start changing the > current ext2 code and then later rename to ext3, or start now from a > separate "clone" of the ext2 code? The main point is if the current ext2 > directory > should be leaved intact, at least until ext3 is stable. Thanks, Cloning it and renaming it to ext3 with the intention to remove ext2 later seems like a sensible approach to me. The ext3 jam target can simply be excluded from the default images until it is ready. Best regards, -Stephan