-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:17:50 -0500 > Von: Rene Gollent <anevilyak@xxxxxxxxx> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Stephan Assmus<superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Maybe I am missing something, but from your explaination, I would say > it's > > intentional. Why would scrolling the parent view affect something local > to > > the child views? > > The problem is that means the view has no way of determining its > viewport. To give an example, if I'm scrolled say, 10% down, the > parent's bounds are something like (top = 1350, bottom = 1737). > However, the child view always gives back (top = 0, bottom = 13000), > which corresponds to the entire range of the scroll bar, regardless of > the actual scroll position. However, the app_server obviously knows, > since it gives correct ranges for Draw's update rects, and also > correctly gives me the appropriate B_EXITED_VIEW / B_OUTSIDE_VIEW > transits. However, I basically can't determine, without the help of > the parent bounds rect, where outside my view the mouse pointer lies, > which is needed to determine the direction to scroll in when drag > selecting with the mouse. Furthermore, that only works in this case > because there's a 1:1 correspondence between the height of the child > and the height of the parent. To me it seems unintuitive at best that > you're saying the child cannot be self contained in this case. There > needs to be some way for the child to discover its current viewport. IIRC outside of Draw() GetClippingRegion() returns the respective region. CU, Ingo