On 02/11/2014 09:38 AM, Axel Dörfler wrote:
Just to repeat Ingo, I'd say we should determine *exactly* what we want to be in the release that isn't there yet. IMAP is not a good point, as we do have IMAP support -- it's just buggy (so "beta" ready) :-)
This should be about the spirit of the "no new features" clause, not about it's exact wording. What we do want to avoid is adding/changing large code parts during a phase where we want to stabilize the code base. And AFAIU you're basically rewriting large parts of the IMAP implementation.
CU, Ingo
