One thing I know for sure is that it would be fun to have a such small device, put it out of your pocket, plug it in and run Haiku... ;) /Efi On 18 April 2012 22:28, Przemysław Pintal <premislaus1988@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Without the video driver does not make sense to use the Raspberry Pi. > Because the whole is too weak, and thanks to the GPU you can decode > 1080p. > > 2012/4/18 François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx>: > > On 18/04/2012 20:09, Pete Goodeve wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 07:03:42AM -0500, Alexander von Gluck wrote: > >>> On 18.04.2012 03:17, Ralf Schülke wrote: > >>>> Raspberry Pi = 30 € > >>>> > >>>> http://www.raspberrypi.org/ [3] > >>>> > >>> > >>> +1. > >>> > >>> My Pi shows up in two days ^_^ > >>> > >> Veering a bit from the original topic, I'll be very interested to follow > >> the progress of "Pi-ku", but I wonder how feasible it will be. > >> > >> Coincidentally I was at a conference over the weekend where Eben > >> Upton himself joined a session (via Skype) on Open Source Hardware. > >> He pointed out that the Pi is not (yet) a completely open platform. > >> I think the audio in particular is proprietary. So there might be some > >> haggling involved before one could get a full port. He did say that > they > >> were working hard on opening everything, though. > > > > Well it's not that much of a problem since it ships with GNU/Linux, if > > we have the source of the drivers. Of course it's not as easy as if the > > specs were all open (as they should be). > > > > The biggest problem likely is the GPU which is proprietary. But well, we > > are already used to VESA mode, so... :^) > > > > François > > > > -- Best Regards E.Georgiadis