On 2011-01-25 at 19:49:30 [+0100], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2011-01-24 at 23:46:51 [+0100], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote: > > > --------------8<-------------- > > > class BPasswordRoster { > > I don't have the time for a closer look ATM, so just a quick comment > > on the > > name. I think the "roster" metaphor doesn't fit that well in this > > case. > > "Manager" would be more suitable IMO. > > According to http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/roster the 2nd > definition is an "itemized list", so I would think it still fits well > enough. From how I've seen the word used (and that's also the impression I get from the referred-to English-language learners definition) such a list seems to be (semi-)public. That doesn't feel right for a private password/key store, which, if I understand it correctly, this is what the class is actually about. > Before introducing a public *Manager class, I would prefer to call it > something like BKeychain. I guess more correctly: BKeyChain. But, since it contains key rings, BKeyStore or BKeySafe seem more fitting. CU, Ingo