[haiku-development] Re: R1/a4 initial planning

  • From: Gabriel Harrison <nyteshade@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:14:06 -0800

Just to play the devil's advocate Ingo, I didn't see anybody come up with a 
solid enough argument for, either. It's clear you really want that path but 
it's also clear many others don't. 


Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 26, 2012, at 4:01 AM, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2012-02-25 at 12:43:13 [+0100], fano il primo <fanoilprimo@xxxxxxxxx> 
> wrote:
> [...]
>> So we're safe? We port Qt on Haiku (obviously it's necessary, as you'd port
>> JAVA, Mono and so on...), but not trash the native API, right?
> I think you misunderstood the purpose of the discussion. This wasn't to make 
> any decision, but rather to explore the idea a bit. It's rather early 
> anyway, as we aren't even close to R1 yet. Since no one came up with a 
> show-stopper argument, I think it's worth investigating the idea further. A 
> GSoC project sounds to me like a good approach.
> CU, Ingo

Other related posts: