Urias McCullough wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:36 AM, SMC.Collins <smc.collins@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As I understand it, the program is about applications, not distrobutions. > > The hiccup becomes frameworks/librarys. I personally think those should be > > approved by the devs. > > > > http://dev.haiku-os.org/wiki/Haiku%20Compatible%20Logo > > > > link to logo page proposal. > > Well yeah, I now see that this has been reinterpreted... and updated > in the last 4 days by Adrien: > > http://dev.haiku-os.org/wiki/Haiku%20Compatible%20Logo?action=history > > BUT: that was not the intent for the "Haiku Compatible" logos initially. > > The first mention of the need for this logo is here: > > //www.freelists.org/post/haiku/Joining-the-admin-team,12 > > And the logos were created shortly afterward. > > Only recently did Adrien assert that the logo was supposed to be used > for "compatible software" - and I guess nobody corrected him. So, this > is will be a brand new concept for the Alpha3 release. > > In any case, that's fine - if we want to re-purpose the logo for > software, I don't care, but it was news to me (and probably others), > that's all. That's news to me too and I strongly object, particularly to the "The Haiku Project is responsible for allowing 3rd-partiesto use the logo." I certainly have better things to do with my time than to judge whether dozens of software packages are "Haikuish" enough. I also don't see the point. CU, Ingo