----- Original Message ----- From: Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:24:06 -0000 (UTC) Subject: [haiku-development] Re: QT and SDL GCC4 libs and Haik compatible Logo program That's news to me too and I strongly object, particularly to the "The Haiku Project is responsible for allowing 3rd-partiesto use the logo." I certainly have better things to do with my time than to judge whether dozens of software packages are "Haikuish" enough. I also don't see the point. CU, Ingo I can understand your objection. I think one thing to clarify however is that this generally would not require by description the intervention of yourself and the other commiter/voting developers. Essentially this would be self/user policed, which is more then adequate. Then only time such a situation would arise that would require dev intervention would be when someone is non compliant and using the logos. I think what needs to be siad however is that without some type of standards, your looking at anarchy. which you don't have to look to hard or far in the opensource software community to find. haikuware "not picking on haikuware btw" has a tremendous amount of software that does not work, does not work correctly, does not respect proper usage of directorys etc. Placing a logo on such applications makes it easier for the users to understand what is a properly functioning application, and what is not. This hopefully reduces dramatically the workload of the developers chasing bugs becuase someone did not properly build a application etc. I certainly don't mind helping and testing these applications. Its not hard work. Its pretty easy and I frequently have some time to invest here. My question about the QT framework being "hiaku" compatible still stands though. It certainly would be nice to be able to say to users, yes here are some QT apps and yes these QT apps work. I also am aware of how much the dev community here dislikes outside API's, but the haiku community at large "users" are a bit app starved. Also having more 3rd party applications isn't hurting to attract users and hopefully some developers. I can only try to represent the users perspective here as I am not a developer on any level. I will keep testing apps, but if there is a direction you'd like to see this takne please let me know. Sean