Ugh spelling. On Feb 3, 2012 12:29 PM, "lodewijk andré de la porte" < lodewijkadlp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The banner has a clear cut (cut between banner and non-banner) and > provides a great deal of visual disimularity to other windows (usefull for > identification). > > I can imagen that in the BeOS days a banner was kind of a big deal, now > these size graphics are used for subtle background gradients. Just don't > put text in the graphic, translates badly. > > Other windows can be given banners as wel. It'd quickly become "this is a > generic info window with the banner missing". > > I don't really care about the look of info windows though. Just my > Satoshi's. > On Feb 3, 2012 12:20 PM, "Matt Madia" <mattmadia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> On Feb 2, 2012 9:29 PM, "Alexander von Gluck" <kallisti5@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>>> "3D Rendering" it is. Simple and descriptive. >> >>>> >> >>>> http://imagebin.org/196948 [1] >> >> > On 02.02.2012 20:16, Ralf Schülke wrote: >> >> -100 Haiku have more and more differnt UI . >> > >> >> > Believe me, I like OpenGL way more... however it *is* trademarked, >> >> I think Ralf is commenting on the look of the preflet, and not on the >> trademark aspect. The other preflets don't have a graphical banner like >> the OpenGL/Mesa 3D preflet. If so, I agree -- the banner isn't >> consistent. Even though the banner has been in the preflet for some time, >> it should still be removed altogether. >> >> --mmadia >> >