"Alexandre Deckner" <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For gcc, i've been lurking at > gcc-xml which is the only tool to my knowledge goes in that > direction. > It would have to be extended to support more indepth analysis, and i > don't know how well it would handle unfinished/semi-broken code. Besides serving as a frontend for LLVM, that's one of the things that clang provides (http://clang.llvm.org/). AFAICT C++ is work in progress at this point, though, but it should be tremendously easier to improve that one than starting from scratch. Bye, Axel.