[haiku-development] Re: Mercurial version string Was:Re: Re: VOTE: Git or Mercurial (hg) as Haiku's new source control tool
- From: "Ingo Weinhold" <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 15:39:23 +0200
On Thu, 12 May 2011 07:26:17 -0400 Jon Yoder <darkwyrm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/12/2011 06:26 AM, Ingo Weinhold wrote:
> > I'm still fan of the comparable revision number idea. Maybe the date
> part
> > can be extended by another component to make it unique? E.g.
> > "2011-05-11-13" would denote the 13th changeset that day. Would that be
> > possible?
> I am, too. Another possibility would be to include the time down to the
> nanosecond level -- something like
> `date -u "+%Y-%m-%d-%k:%M.%N"` could get the job in a way that is quite
> readable and may not even need to include the hash itself. Just my $0.02.
Do the tools even store times with that precision? At least a simple "log" only
produces full seconds with either. git's --date=raw option (which I'd expect to
show what is actually stored) produces what looks like a number of seconds
since some point in time.
CU, Ingo
Other related posts:
