On 2010-07-25 at 08:21:20 [+0200], pete.goodeve@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:16:10AM -0400, Rene Gollent wrote: > > Unless all the enhancements are tightly focused on the same small > > area, it's actually much easier/better from a ticket management > > standpoint to split them up for a number of reasons, most notably that > > it's easier to take ownership of one small chunk, fix it, and close > > the ticket so it's clear that it's done. If you have a ticket with a > > giant laundry list of unrelated enhancements in it, the only way to > > manage it is to keep a checklist in there, which often will mean > > anyone wishing to make those changes will have to read through the > > whole ticket history to figure out what has/hasn't been done. This > > also it makes ownership less clear, since it becomes less obvious if > > the current owner of the ticket is actively working on a particular > > feature or not, and thus makes it more annoying to coordinate not > > stepping on each other's toes. > > OK. Makes sense. I'll retract my suggestion then... (:-/) > Might be nice to have that 'laundry list' somewhere, though, to get > an overview of the app's state -- the wiki, perhaps? That would then be a custom Trac search for Icon-O-Matic enhencement tickets. :-) Best regards, -Stephan