Have no idea on how technically do it bu i already see a lot of case where it can be a problem in a user way. 1. having a downloading progress bar on the icon itself seems awesome but would it be really usefull ? I mean, it's the browser work / torrent soft to show me the progress of a download. 2. What happens if a download stop / interrupt accidentually ? 3. According point 1, would the memory/tracker responsiveness cost worth the cause ? Only a 100% final-user side questions 0,02€ ... On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 00:18, Stephan Aßmus <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On 2009-04-07 at 00:01:47 [+0200], pieter@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > I was wondering if it is possible to add an overlay over an icon in > > Tracker, just like TortoiseSVN does this in Windows explorer. I see that > > the bar (space available on volume) is hardcoded in BPose::DrawBar of > > Tracker. But maybe it is possible to just create an icon with only a > > small part drawn, and to tell Tracker to lay it on top of the existing > > icon? > > > > The reason I ask this is that it would be cool to have functionality like > > TortoiseSVN integrated (somehow) in Tracker. The project Molesvn attempts > > svn integration as a tracker addon, but it doesn't really offer tight > > integration and it crashes for me. It hasn't been updated since 2005... > > http://www.bebits.com/app/4170 Maybe it can be updated. > > > > If icons are not possible, perhaps a small daemon (like TortoiseSVN has) > > could be used with node monitoring to create and update attributes for > > all subversion-controlled files. > > > > I'm just throwing out an idea I thought was kinda neat, I won't have time > > to work on it for quite a while, unfortunately. Real life, etc... > > I have not thought about this deeply, but one solution could be to invent > icon overlay support via an additional icon file attribute. If the overlay > icon attribute is there, Tracker will overlay the secondary icon. I mean, > Tracker would have to be changed to behave that way. The overlay attribute > could support both setting an actual icon, as well as setting an icon > indirectly via a "type" or "named overlay". Another option is to create a > more powerful Tracker plugin API and solve the problem that way. The last > option is to actually modify the file icons. Similar to what NetPositive > did during downloads, only it's not as easy now with the vector icons, > since you need to use the private vector icon backend API to insert new > graphics objects into the icons. Most files will not normally have an icon, > so you would have to write a lot of icon attributes on files which would > otherwise get an icon via their type. (I guess changing the file type to > give it another icon is not an option.) Another interesting thing would be > to extend the Haiku svn port to support file meta data in a more integrated > way. For example, SVN already maintains a mime type for files under source > control, in fact I think it supports arbitrary "properties" and versioning > them just like file data. Yet the BeOS/Haiku port does not apply those on > the files as attributes. If this was changed, svn could as well write > special attributes to indicate the VC status. That way it would never get > out of sync. > > Best regards, > -Stephan > >