On 02/17/2015 07:07 PM, Augustin Cavalier wrote:
On 2/17/2015 12:55 PM, Donn Cave wrote:" Release builds, that's up the air. It might be there, or it might not be. Or we might leave it in the PATH but not have it created ..." It's no wonder you don't see what I'm talking about, if this gratuitous change to the directory structure is, to you, "having an additional element."Right, "might or might not be". If there are a significant number of people that want it, we'd leave it in.
I don't recall that there was never any discussion about removing the ~/config/non-packaged directory tree. And I'd be very much opposed to that as it would remove the standard installation location for user local non-packaged software.
CU, Ingo
