Hello, everyone! I have been working on creating the GCC 2 and 4 optional packages for R1A4, and have come upon an issue. The GCC2 package built just fine, but the GCC 4.6.2 package simply will not build without me encountering a segfault/ICE about 40% into the build every time. I have tried the process multiple times, and have tried using both the 4.6.2 compiler and the 4.5.3 compiler as well, yet both bomb out with the same Internal Compiler Error during the process, generally on the file gcc/c-parser.c. After trial-and-error (binary searching the buildtools), plus me stumbling upon this post by Oliver, it became obvious that the configure option of --enable-frame-pointer introduced in btrev43028 is causing the issue on x86. //www.freelists.org/post/haiku-development/The-r1alpha4-branch,62 I used "strings" on the 4.6.2 x86_64 package made by Alex, and it compiled fine with "--enable-frame-pointer". On x86 though, it simply won't build with this option. In GCC 4.6,"-fomit-frame-pointer" is turned on by default for -O optimization or higher, so by adding "--enable-frame-pointer" to configure, basically "-fno-omit-frame-pointer" is turned on during the build, which is the pre-4.6 behavior. For the heck of it, I applied the GCC-provided patches for upgrading pristine GCC 4.6.2 to GCC 4.6.3 (core and g++) to the sources in our repository and started a build. It makes it all the way to the end, and all seem well after some quick testing. In other words, I can make a native GCC 4.6.3 build just fine, but not GCC 4.6.2. I have tried applying some patches here and there (differences between 4.6.2 and 4.6.3) to try to get it to build, but haven't found what the culprit is just yet. By Googling around, I can't seem to find anything definitive about this regression, so it doesn't seem to be widespread. I suppose I can go through the aforementioned patch files (likely "core") and maybe hunt down the culprit, but I'm not sure that is a good approach to fix this issue. I think there are two options, currently: 1.) Compile 4.6.2 without the --enable-frame-pointer option 2.) Make the upgrade to 4.6.3 which apparently overcame this regression I'm guessing that option 1 will be preferred, seeing as we generally don't like to make version upgrades this close to a release. Any opinions? I did notice that Korli managed to get 4.6.2 to build in the past for x86 with --enable-frame-pointer, but even when I built older Haiku revisions (back in 4.5.3 era), I still got the same ICE as I'm getting currently. I'm not sure what he did to get it building back then, but I surely can't build it natively no matter what Haiku revisions I have tried. - joe PS: In the meantime I'll keep trying things on my end, but there's no guarantees I'll find anything. We also want to release a week from now, so time is getting tight, obviously.