Niels Sascha Reedijk <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2011/5/3 Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > And while I would usually prefer hg over git, I think the missing > > hard link > > feature of BFS simply disqualifies hg for now. > Actually, hg should not be disqualified because of BFS hard links. > With the hg bookmarks extension you can create in-tree local > light-weight 'branches'. In fact, this works exactly like how git > works. So, like I said before, feature-wise there is no difference > between these tools. Alright, I missed that from your earlier mails. Thanks for the explanation! Bye, Axel.