Brecht Machiels<brecht@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I've seen several independent benchmarks (they should be easy to find), > and git is indeed the fastest and it's repositories are the smallest. It doesn't really matter which tool is the fastest at a specific action, but if the tool's performance is acceptable. While I guess that git will be faster overall compared to hg, I don't expect it would be a performance issue to use either tool for our repository. And while I would usually prefer hg over git, I think the missing hard link feature of BFS simply disqualifies hg for now. And why not use git then, if it comes down to preference, anyway? Bye, Axel.