On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:54:31 +0100 Adrien Destugues <pulkomandy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It's time for the switch. I think all (most ?) developpers agree on > that. Tracking patches that get out of sync with the tree is taking more > time than needed, handling the commits from the GSoC students by hand, > messing with branches and merging changes around, are tasks that should > mostly be done by the tools. svn has trouble handling them. > The problem is (was?) to know which alternative is best for us. The > commitee was setup to decide on that. The next step is flipping the > switch, I think... Here's a misunderstanding. The committee/task force/... is not a decision making entity. Their goal was to examine the possible tools and prepare a list of arguments for and against each, considering possible work flows for Haiku's development process. Which tool will be chosen is to be decided by the Haiku developers. CU, Ingo